baratron: (london)
[personal profile] baratron
Pet hate: people who write London phone numbers as "0207" or "0208" plus 7 digits. It's incorrect. The code for London is 020. The number is 8whatever. If you are in London and pick up the phone, and dial the seven digit number after "0208", you won't get through. If, instead, you dial the eight digit number beginning with "8", you will.

What has inspired this rant? Several things, including listening to my answer phone messages, and trolls on one of my irc channels (making it completely impossible to have a conversation there, and all of the ops are idle). Plus the garage at the back of ours just spent out on a huge shiny new sign, that sits just off the edge of our property and swings in the breeze - and it has the phone number listed as "0208" + 7 digits. GAH.

Date: 2006-02-23 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceno.livejournal.com
Heh, I used to be an 0208 person but I've been training myself not to do that anymore. Do I get a biscuit? :)

a windmill replies

Date: 2006-02-23 10:23 pm (UTC)
redbird: Edward Gorey picture of a bicyclist on a high wirer (tricky)
From: [personal profile] redbird
I think of my mother's number as 208-xxx-xxxx. Partly because it used to be 081-xxx-xxxx, so I'm used to thinking of the 8 as part of the area code, and partly because, living in North America, I expect the local part of a phone number to be seven digits (with the hyphen where I put it above).

Of course, most of the time what I actually dial* is 011-44-208-xxx-xxx. And the rest of the time it's as likely to be the entire string starting with 0208 as just 8xxx-xxxx, because if I'm calling her from within the UK it's usually not from within that part of Greater London.

If BT hadn't repeatedly changed the area codes, this would all be simpler.

*Not that I have a dial phone anymore.

Re: a windmill replies

Date: 2006-02-24 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aca.livejournal.com
It wasn't BT it was Oftel/Ofcom the telecoms regulator - ie teh government - who did this. Whilst it was something of an upheavle I still think it preferable to the US approach of splitting cities into 2 area codes.

Plus variable length area codes and local numbers mean you can provide an urban area with 6m or so phone numbers without doubling up area codes. Which is a good thing, I reckons.

Date: 2006-02-24 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aca.livejournal.com
Hurrah for phone number pedantry!

Date: 2006-02-24 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thekumquat.livejournal.com
Hear hear!
Sadly in all the applications for a contract that I'm ploughing through atm, I'm not allowed to reject the ones who can't get their own phone numbers right...

Re: a windmill replies

Date: 2006-02-24 01:08 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
Variable length codes have their value, certainly--it was the double switch for London that I think overloaded people: 01 to 071/081 to 020 and eight-digit local numbers.

Date: 2006-02-24 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
UK phone numbers always confuse the hell out of me. I think that peoples' inconsistancy in how they record them is one of the reasons why.

Date: 2006-02-24 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elfgeek.livejournal.com
I wholeheartedly agree with you, I am all for 020!
SO & PO on the other hand are two separate cities so I have less of a gripe with ppl who write 0238-xxxxxx and 0239-xxxxxx instead of 023-xxxxxxx.

Profile

baratron: (Default)
baratron

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 07:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios