![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I am suffering from a severe overabundance of red tape. The very short version of this is: the majority of the UK rail companies have a rule of "no tricycles" because of space - they are much wider than normal bikes. This seems fair enough most of the time, especially on suburban trains - in fact, cycles of any type are prohibited on peak hour services, unless folded and in a bag.
However, this rule applies at all times of day and night, including 6am on Saturday mornings and other such antisocial hours. How many people will be on the train at that time of day to be inconvenienced by it? I would be willing to do things like pay for a ticket for the tricycle, call them a minimum of 24 hours before I travel so they know about it and can dictate what train I'm allowed to be on, and travel at really obnoxious times of day when there won't be anyone else on the train: but they just say no. The DDA doesn't apply because I don't need the trike to travel. The crazy thing is if it was powered, I could claim it was a mobility scooter and then it would be allowed, even though it would be even bigger and take up even more space.
I just can't get my head round rules that are so inflexible, you can't even travel at obnoxious o'clock at the weekend, and even if I bought a ticket for the trike. That would be two extra fares they'd be getting on the obnoxious o'clock train that wouldn't usually be used. How is this ban in anyone's best interests? But remember, the head of one of the UK rail companies (Silverlink, iirc) actually said "I don't understand why people would take one form of transport and put it on another". So that's the kind of wrong-thinking we're dealing with, here.
Bah.
However, this rule applies at all times of day and night, including 6am on Saturday mornings and other such antisocial hours. How many people will be on the train at that time of day to be inconvenienced by it? I would be willing to do things like pay for a ticket for the tricycle, call them a minimum of 24 hours before I travel so they know about it and can dictate what train I'm allowed to be on, and travel at really obnoxious times of day when there won't be anyone else on the train: but they just say no. The DDA doesn't apply because I don't need the trike to travel. The crazy thing is if it was powered, I could claim it was a mobility scooter and then it would be allowed, even though it would be even bigger and take up even more space.
I just can't get my head round rules that are so inflexible, you can't even travel at obnoxious o'clock at the weekend, and even if I bought a ticket for the trike. That would be two extra fares they'd be getting on the obnoxious o'clock train that wouldn't usually be used. How is this ban in anyone's best interests? But remember, the head of one of the UK rail companies (Silverlink, iirc) actually said "I don't understand why people would take one form of transport and put it on another". So that's the kind of wrong-thinking we're dealing with, here.
Bah.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 06:30 pm (UTC)Maybe it does. The DDA requires that organisations make reasonable adjustments so that you can access the same service a person without your disability could. Someone who could ride a bike would be able to take his/her bike on the train. For you to be able to access the same service ie. of travelling somewhere carrying another means of transport for use at the other end, you need to be able to take a tricycle. Indeed, by permitting mobility scooters, they've already conceded the point - people with a different disability who need to be able to carry their own means of transport for use at their destination can do so, so why can't you?
It's certainly worth a stern letter making that point, with the hope that on being threatened with a DDA claim they'll be a bit more sensible and concede the point.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 07:12 pm (UTC)Then again, they might all be like the tricycle manufacturers I rang up today, none of whom could understand why I'd want to take it on the train, rather than putting it in the boot of a car :/ The whole idea of "human power to avoid greenhouse gas emissions" seemed a bit of a novel concept to the cycle companies :/
I'm *trying* to acquire a tricycle that folds in width to avoid this whole problem, but only one exists on the UK market (http://www.diblasi.it/TabellaComparativa.asp?Prd=Tricycles&Lng=En), and I'm not convinced about the position of the luggage rack. I'm trying to find engineers to work on the problem for me - either to retrofit an existing tricycle to fold, or to attack the problem of the luggage rack positioning on the Di Blasi. But this is rather dependent on finding somewhere that has one in stock that I can get to, because I'm buggered if I'm paying £900 for something without a decent test run.
Plus, it's still a problem, because unless I'm allowed to take it on the train semi-folded and finish folding it in the doorway, I won't be able to lift it onto the train. Because I can't lift 20kg of mass without wheels to help bump it up (the most I can safely carry is about 5kg). Gah. It's all too complicated.
I'm still bloody angry with the woman from one custom cycle manufacturer that I'll leave unnamed in a public post, who told me point blank that I wouldn't be able to afford a custom trike, without knowing anything about my income or ability to pay. Actually, I was already aware of the price before I rang. And, frankly, £2500 isn't that much considering that it would last as long as I do, and the difference it would make to my life. Well, whatever. Don't take my business, and insult me while you're at it.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 01:36 am (UTC)Out of interest, where did yours come from?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 08:30 am (UTC)It doesn't look anything like a baby buggy, but it does excite sympathetic amusement, so that probably helps.
The train company was [pause to ask Rob] First Great Western Link. First Great Western Intercity were quite willing to take the trike (or the individual staff were) but it wouldn't physically go through the door in the guards van or whatever that bit is called.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-11 12:20 am (UTC)I'm pretty sure the Di Blasi should work for me, and even if it's not perfect I know enough engineering geeks to sort it out - but it's annoying that I have to go to so much effort to be able to take my cycle on the train when other people who ride two-wheelers can just turn up and go. But I'm too emotionally tired to try to fight the battle.